Search in Co-Wiki

AlphaGo versus Fan Hui

game-theory 510 tokens 8 outbound links

AlphaGo versus Fan Hui

Games ### Summary In this match, DeepMind used AlphaGo's distributed version with 1,202 CPUs and 176 GPUs For each game there was a one-hour set time limit for each player followed by three 30-second byo-yomi overtime periods.

During this match, AlphaGo and Fan Hui also played another five informal games with shorter time control (each player having just three 30-second byo-yomi) and AlphaGo defeated Fan by three to two.

Game 3 Fan Hui (black) v. AlphaGo (white), 7 October 2015, AlphaGo won by resignation.

Responses AlphaGo's victory shocked the Go community. Lee Sedol commented that AlphaGo reached the top of the amateur level in this match, but had not yet reached the professional level, and he could give AlphaGo one or two stones. Ke Jie and Mi Yuting thought that the strength of AlphaGo in this match was equal to that of a candidate for Go professional, and extremely close to the professional level, while Shi Yue thought that it already reached the professional level.

Canadian AI specialist jonathan-schaeffer, comparing AlphaGo with a "child prodigy" that lacked experience, considered this match "not yet a Deep Blue moment", and said that the real achievement would be "when the program plays a player in the true top echelon".

See also *[[alphago-versus-lee-sedol]] *[[alphago-versus-ke-jie]]

References